Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E5700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E5700

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 105.63W 2x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 31.32 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 113.88 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2010 vs Feb, 2010 Release date 4 months later
Front view of Intel Itanium 9310

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9310

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 5x more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 10 MB vs 2 MB 5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Features Key features of the Pentium E5700  vs Itanium 9310 

clock speed

Itanium 9310
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E5700  vs
Itanium 9310 
Clock speed 3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1248

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 130W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 31.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 113.88 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 105.63W

bus

Architecture FSB QPI
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 2,400 MHz

details

Pentium E5700  vs
Itanium 9310 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 10 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 8

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium E5700
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9310
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus