0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 |
Released July, 2010
Intel Pentium E5700
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5700
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C |
VS
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q6600
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 85.31W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 62.2 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 3.52 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2010 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| |||||||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Quad Q6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,840
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,490
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
1,537
Core2 Quad Q6600
1,306
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
127,200 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,613
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,161
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
3,087
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,541
GeekBench
Pentium E5700
4,356
Core2 Quad Q6600
5,918
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5700
1,743
Core2 Quad Q6600
2,970
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5700
1,224
Core2 Quad Q6600
924
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 1.19 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 62.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 13 | 278 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E5700 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
Intel Core i5 3570K vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||