0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Duo E8400 |
Released July, 2010
Intel Pentium E5700
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5700
![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C | ![]() | Newer Jul, 2010 |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E8400
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.22 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 72.4 °C | Almost the same | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newer | Jul, 2010 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 3.87 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Duo E8400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,840
Core2 Duo E8400
2,982
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
1,537
Core2 Duo E8400
1,625
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
127,200 MB/s
Core2 Duo E8400
128,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,613
Core2 Duo E8400
2,826
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
3,087
Core2 Duo E8400
3,092
GeekBench
Pentium E5700
4,356
Core2 Duo E8400
4,794
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5700
1,743
Core2 Duo E8400
2,160
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5700
1,224
Core2 Duo E8400
1,251
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 1.83 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 13 | 125 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | 4.23 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E5700 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E8400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
E8400 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
E8400 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $179 | |
E8400 vs Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $200 | |
E8400 vs Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs E7500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
banculjak (04:33 PM, March 7, 2015)