0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Duo E4600 |
Released July, 2010
Intel Pentium E5700
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5700
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 1,743 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 1,743 | vs | 1,384 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 3.17 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | vs | 3.61 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 73.3 °C | Almost the same | |||
Newer | Jul, 2010 | vs | Oct, 2007 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo E4600 vs the Pentium E5700. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Duo E4600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,840
Core2 Duo E4600
2,274
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
1,537
Core2 Duo E4600
1,242
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
127,200 MB/s
Core2 Duo E4600
102,150 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,613
Core2 Duo E4600
2,148
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
3,087
Core2 Duo E4600
3,640
GeekBench
Pentium E5700
4,356
Core2 Duo E4600
3,640
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5700
1,743
Core2 Duo E4600
1,384
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5700
1,224
Core2 Duo E4600
885
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core2 Duo E4600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 1.49 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core2 Duo E4600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 167,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 73.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 3.17 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | 3.61 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 3.17 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E5700 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E4600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $179 | |
E5700 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
E5700 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs E7400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
E5700 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $47 | |
E4600 vs E3300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||