0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5700 vs Core i3 3220 |
Released July, 2010
Intel Pentium E5700
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5700
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3220
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 3.43 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | vs | 3.46 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jul, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5700 vs Core i3 3220
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,840
Core i3 3220
5,399
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
1,537
Core i3 3220
2,501
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
127,200 MB/s
Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
2,613
Core i3 3220
5,351
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5700
3,087
Core i3 3220
5,707
GeekBench
Pentium E5700
4,356
Core i3 3220
8,919
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5700
1,743
Core i3 3220
4,229
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5700
1,224
Core i3 3220
1,764
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 2.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 44.69W |
details | Pentium E5700 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 33 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 65.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 13 | 50 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium E5700 ![]() | Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A6 5400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $75 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $76 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||