CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5700 vs 86 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium E5700

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium E5700

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E5700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E5700

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,224 vs 617 Around 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2010 vs Jun, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Turion X2 Ultra 86

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 Ultra 86

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 74.1 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5700 vs Turion X2 Ultra 86

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E5700  vs
Turion X2 Ultra 86 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.9 pt/W 1.74 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W

details

Pentium E5700  vs
Turion X2 Ultra 86 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1.95 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.97 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.87 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 400 MHz
Intel Pentium E5700
Report a correction
AMD Turion X2 Ultra 86
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus