Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium E5700

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium E5700

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E5700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E5700

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2 GHz 50% higher clock speed
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,613 vs 1,455 Around 80% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,537 vs 808 More than 90% better geekbench 3 single core score
Slightly more l3 cache 2 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK
Newer Jul, 2010 vs May, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 60

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 60

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 52.81W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 74.1 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5700 vs Turion 64 X2 60

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E5700
127,200 MB/s
Turion 64 X2 60
53,400 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E5700  vs
Turion 64 X2 60 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

power consumption

TDP 65W 31W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 27.16 $/year
Performance per watt 1.9 pt/W 1.93 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 25.19W

details

Pentium E5700  vs
Turion 64 X2 60 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C Unknown - 95°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.87 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz 2.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium E5700
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 60
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus