0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5700 vs AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
Released July, 2010
Intel Pentium E5700
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5700
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration |
Features Key features of the Pentium E5700 vs Second Generation Opteron 8218
clock speed
Pentium E5700
3 GHz
Second Generation Opteron 8218
2.6 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium E5700
2 MB
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5700 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Pentium E5700 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | 0 - 72°C | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 77.19W |
Intel Pentium E5700 ![]() | AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $64 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $64 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $64 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $64 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7400 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $64 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $64 | |
Intel Pentium E5300 vs E5700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||