Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E5700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E5700

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218

Reasons to consider the
AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration

Features Key features of the Pentium E5700  vs Second Generation Opteron 8218 

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E5700  vs
Second Generation Opteron 8218 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Pentium E5700  vs
Second Generation Opteron 8218 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 8
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C 0 - 72°C

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 83.22 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 77.19W
Intel Pentium E5700
Report a correction
AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus