Winner
AMD R R-464L
CPUBoss recommends the AMD R R-464L based on its performance and power consumption.
See full details | Intel Pentium E5700 vs AMD R R-464L |
![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | AMD R R-464LCPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,210 | vs | 2,840 | Around 50% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better performance per watt | 3.96 pt/W | vs | 1.9 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Jul, 2010 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Pentium E5700 | vs | R R-464L |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | 3.96 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium E5700 | vs | R R-464L |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 1,303,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 11 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.81 - 1.3V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | AMD Radeon HD 7660G | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 497 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 686 MHz |
Intel Pentium E5700 ![]() | AMD R R-464L ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $179 | |
E5700 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
E5700 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $200 | |
E5700 vs E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $125 | |
E5700 vs E7400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | ||
E5700 vs E6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||