CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5400 vs N330 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium E5400

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium E5400

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E5400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E5400

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,400 vs 1,128 Around 25% better geekbench 3 single core score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.49 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon II PCs N330

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II PCs N330

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Newer May, 2010 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 1 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5400 vs Athlon II PCs N330

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E5400
114,800 MB/s
Athlon II PCs N330
92.6 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E5400  vs
Athlon II PCs N330 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.73 pt/W 1.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W

details

Pentium E5400  vs
Athlon II PCs N330 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.75 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.49 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz 2.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Pentium E5400
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II PCs N330
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus