0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5300 vs Core2 Duo E6400 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Pentium E5300
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5300
![]() | Much better PassMark score 1,549 | ![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,271 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better PassMark score | 1,549 | vs | 1,295 | Around 20% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,271 | vs | 1,961 | More than 15% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 61.4 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 3.33 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 3.33 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jan, 2008 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo E6400 vs the Pentium E5300. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5300 vs Core2 Duo E6400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
2,510
Core2 Duo E6400
2,071
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
1,358
Core2 Duo E6400
1,133
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
110,800 MB/s
Core2 Duo E6400
91,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
2,271
Core2 Duo E6400
1,961
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
2,677
Core2 Duo E6400
2,126
GeekBench
Pentium E5300
4,257
Core2 Duo E6400
3,267
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5300
1,549
Core2 Duo E6400
1,295
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5300
1,052
Core2 Duo E6400
801
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5300 | vs | Core2 Duo E6400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.66 pt/W | 1.35 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Pentium E5300 | vs | Core2 Duo E6400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 167,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 8 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 61.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E5300 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E6400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $179 | |
E5300 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
E5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
E5300 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E5300 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E5300 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $200 | |
E5300 vs E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $64 | |
E5300 vs E5700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||