CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5300 vs J1800 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium E5300 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium E5300  based on its performance, single-core performance and overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E5300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E5300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 1,549 vs 1,028 More than 50% better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,052 vs 554 Around 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz vs 2.58 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.41 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz vs 2.58 GHz Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 52.81W 6.5x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 6.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 6.5x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 5 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5300 vs Celeron J1800

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E5300
110,800 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E5300  vs
Celeron J1800 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.41 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 792 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium E5300  vs
Celeron J1800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.87 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 65W 10W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 1.66 pt/W 3.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 8.13W
Intel Pentium E5300
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus