0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5300 vs AMD Phenom II X3 B75 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Pentium E5300
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5300
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz |
![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Phenom II X3 B75
- 3 GHz
- Tri core
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X3 B75
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | More cores 3 |
![]() | More threads 3 | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 73 °C | Almost the same | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more threads | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.2 GHz | vs | 3.87 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5300 vs Phenom II X3 B75
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
2,510
Phenom II X3 B75
4,254
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
1,358
Phenom II X3 B75
1,556
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5300
110,800 MB/s
Phenom II X3 B75
120,500 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5300
1,549
Phenom II X3 B75
3,155
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5300
1,052
Phenom II X3 B75
1,077
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5300 | vs | Phenom II X3 B75 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Tri core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.66 pt/W | 1.46 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 77.19W |
details | Pentium E5300 | vs | Phenom II X3 B75 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 3 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.67 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.8 - 1.43V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 73°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
Intel Pentium E5300 ![]() | AMD Phenom II X3 B75 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $72 | |
E8400 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Q6600 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E6300 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
E7500 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$167 | $72 | |
E6550 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $72 | |
E3400 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs B75 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||