Intel Pentium E5300 vs AMD G G-T56E |
Released January, 2008
Intel Pentium E5300
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5300
 | Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
Released June, 2012
AMD G G-T56E
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD G G-T56E
| | Much lower typical power consumption 14.63W | | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm |
| | Newer Jun, 2012 | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Pentium E5300CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | Around 60% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,052 | vs | 441 | Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 52.81W | 3.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 3.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5300 vs G G-T56E
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5300 | vs | G G-T56E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Pentium E5300 | vs | G G-T56E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.87 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.66 pt/W | 2.23 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 14.63W | |
 Intel Pentium E5300  Report a correction |  AMD G G-T56E Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $72 | $179 | |
| E5300 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| E5300 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| E5300 vs E6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $125 | |
| E5300 vs E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $167 | |
| E5300 vs E6550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $125 | |
| E5300 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $64 | |
| E5300 vs E5700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
