Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium E5200

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium E5200

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E5200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E5200

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,230 vs 1,004 Around 2.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 1.45 pt/$ vs 0.76 pt/$ More than 90% better performance per dollar
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C vs 63.4 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,015 vs 751 More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2008 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 1.6 pt/W vs 0.59 pt/W Around 2.8x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Pentium D 925

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium D 925

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz 20% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.23 GHz vs 3.78 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5200 vs D 925

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E5200  vs
D 925 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
P

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 1.6 pt/W 0.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 77.19W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Pentium E5200  vs
D 925 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 228,000,000 376,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 15
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 1.2 - 1.34V
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C Unknown - 63.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.78 GHz 4.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.9 GHz 4.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.78 GHz 4.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium E5200
Report a correction
Intel Pentium D 925
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus