0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5200 vs Core2 Duo E4300 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Pentium E5200
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5200
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 1,488 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,015 | ![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,230 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 1,488 | vs | 1,050 | More than 40% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,015 | vs | 665 | Around 55% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,230 | vs | 1,660 | Around 35% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.6 pt/W | vs | 1.14 pt/W | More than 40% better performance per watt | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 61.4 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | vs | 3.21 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2008 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core2 Duo E4300 vs the Pentium E5200. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5200 vs Core2 Duo E4300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
2,404
Core2 Duo E4300
1,754
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
1,312
Core2 Duo E4300
960
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
106,400 MB/s
Core2 Duo E4300
77,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
2,230
Core2 Duo E4300
1,660
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
2,456
Core2 Duo E4300
3,008
GeekBench
Pentium E5200
4,003
Core2 Duo E4300
3,008
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5200
1,488
Core2 Duo E4300
1,050
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5200
1,015
Core2 Duo E4300
665
Reviews Word on the street
Pentium E5200 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 | ||
![]() | 9.7 | 8.6 |
---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5200 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
details | Pentium E5200 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 167,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 61.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 36 | 6 | |
Overclock review score | 5 | 4 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.78 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.6 pt/W | 1.14 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium E5200 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E4300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $179 | |
E5200 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E5200 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
E5200 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $117 | |
E5200 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E5200 vs E6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E5200 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $167 | |
E5200 vs E6550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||