Intel Pentium E5200 vs Core i5 650 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Pentium E5200
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5200
 | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 650
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 650
| | Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 100.22W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 37.54 $/year | 2.4x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 96.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 72.6 °C | Almost the same | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.31 GHz | vs | 3.78 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.08 GHz | vs | 3.9 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2010 | vs | Jul, 2008 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5200 vs Core i5 650
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5200 | vs | Core i5 650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| LGA 1156 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 73W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 37.54 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 96.89 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.6 pt/W | 4.67 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 100.22W | |
details | Pentium E5200 | vs | Core i5 650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
| Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 382,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 12 | 24 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.65 - 1.4V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 72.6°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 36 | 21 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.78 GHz | 4.31 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | 5.08 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | 4.31 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 733 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Pentium E5200  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 650 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $205 | $144 | |
| Intel Core i5 2400 vs 650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $144 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs i5 650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $144 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs i5 650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $213 | $144 | |
| Intel Core i5 750 vs 650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $135 | $144 | |
| Intel Core i3 2120 vs i5 650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $144 | |
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs 650 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $179 | $72 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
