0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5200 vs Core i5 650 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Pentium E5200
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5200
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 650
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 650
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 100.22W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 37.54 $/year | 2.4x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 96.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 72.6 °C | Almost the same | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.31 GHz | vs | 3.78 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.08 GHz | vs | 3.9 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jan, 2010 | vs | Jul, 2008 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5200 vs Core i5 650
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
2,404
Core i5 650
4,709
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
1,312
Core i5 650
2,168
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
106,400 MB/s
Core i5 650
1,550,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
2,230
Core i5 650
4,675
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5200
2,456
Core i5 650
4,902
GeekBench
Pentium E5200
4,003
Core i5 650
6,669
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E5200
1,488
Core i5 650
3,116
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E5200
1,015
Core i5 650
1,319
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5200 | vs | Core i5 650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
LGA 1156 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 73W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 37.54 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 96.89 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.6 pt/W | 4.67 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 100.22W |
details | Pentium E5200 | vs | Core i5 650 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 382,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 24 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.65 - 1.4V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 72.6°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 36 | 21 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.78 GHz | 4.31 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | 5.08 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | 4.31 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 733 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium E5200 ![]() | Intel Core i5 650 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $144 | |
Intel Core i5 2400 vs 650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $144 | |
Intel Core i3 2100 vs i5 650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $144 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs i5 650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | $144 | |
Intel Core i5 750 vs 650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $144 | |
Intel Core i5 3470 vs 650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$144 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i5 650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||