Intel Pentium E5200 vs AMD Sempron 130 |
Released July, 2008
Intel Pentium E5200
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5200
 | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much better PassMark score 1,488 |
| | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,015 | | More cores 2 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 130
- 2.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 130
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W | | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better PassMark score | 1,488 | vs | 656 | More than 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,015 | vs | 714 | More than 40% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | vs | 3.73 GHz | Almost the same | |||
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 52.81W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5200 vs Sempron 130
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5200 | vs | Sempron 130 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
details | Pentium E5200 | vs | Sempron 130 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 36 | 1 | |
| Overclock review score | 5 | 0 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.78 GHz | 3.73 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | 3.73 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.6 pt/W | 1.73 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 36.56W | |
 Intel Pentium E5200  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 130 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $72 | $179 | |
| E5200 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| E5200 vs E2180 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $125 | |
| E5200 vs E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $117 | |
| E5200 vs E4500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | $167 | |
| E5200 vs E6550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| E5200 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| E5200 vs E6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
