Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E2210

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2210

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz 2.8x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.26 MB Around 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.26 MB/core More than 95% more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Apple APL 2298

Reasons to consider the
Apple APL 2298

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Sep, 2009 vs Apr, 2009 Release date 5 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2210 vs APL 2298

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E2210  vs
APL 2298 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A PowerVR SGX535
GPU clock speed N/A 200 MHz

details

Pentium E2210  vs
APL 2298 
Architecture x86-64 ARM
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.26 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.26 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 52.81W N/A
Intel Pentium E2210
Report a correction
Apple APL 2298
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus