0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E2200 vs 4 531 |
Released October, 2007
Intel Pentium E2200
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2200
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | More cores 2 |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 1.35 pt/W |
VS
Released April, 2004
Intel Pentium 4 531
- 3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 4 531
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.82 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.15 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.35 pt/W | vs | 1.03 pt/W | More than 30% better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 68.25W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 73.3 °C | vs | 67.7 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Oct, 2007 | vs | Apr, 2004 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.82 GHz | vs | 3.09 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.15 GHz | vs | 3.83 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2200 vs 4 531
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2200
2,056
Pentium 4 531
927
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2200
1,138
Pentium 4 531
788
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2200
93,700 MB/s
Pentium 4 531
104,050 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2200 | vs | 4 531 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.35 pt/W | 1.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium E2200 | vs | 4 531 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 125,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 15 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 1.2 - 1.43V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 67.7°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.09 GHz | 3.82 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | 4.15 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.09 GHz | 3.82 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E2200 ![]() | Intel Pentium 4 531 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E2200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Pentium E2180 vs E2200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 vs Pentium E2200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $67 | |
Intel Pentium E5300 vs E2200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$117 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E4500 vs Pentium E2200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $67 | |
Intel Pentium E5200 vs E2200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Pentium E2200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||