Intel Pentium E2200 vs Core2 Duo E6305 |
Released October, 2007
Intel Pentium E2200
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2200
 | Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.09 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.83 GHz |
VS
Announced September, 2013
Intel Core2 Duo E6305
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E6305
| | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Has virtualization support Yes |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.2 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.09 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium E2200 vs Core2 Duo E6305
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2200 | vs | Core2 Duo E6305 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
details | Pentium E2200 | vs | Core2 Duo E6305 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.09 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.09 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium E2200  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E6305 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $67 | $117 | |
| E2200 vs E4500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| E2200 vs E2180 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $179 | |
| E2200 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| E2200 vs E6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $106 | |
| E2200 vs E4300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $163 | |
| E2200 vs 945 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $125 | |
| E2200 vs E7500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
