Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium E2200

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium E2200

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E2200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2200

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 93,700 MB/s vs 24,800 MB/s More than 3.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per dollar 1.31 pt/$ vs 0.76 pt/$ Around 75% better performance per dollar
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.09 GHz vs 1.87 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.83 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Slightly better PassMark score 1,203 vs 271 Around 4.5x better PassMark score
Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 2.03W vs 52.81W 26x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 9.71 pt/W vs 1.35 pt/W Around 7.2x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 26x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 2.19 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 26x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jun, 2008 vs Oct, 2007 Release date 8 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2200 vs Atom N270

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E2200
93,700 MB/s
Atom N270
24,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

x264 HD 4.0

Pentium E2200
22.36 fps
Atom N270
5.1 fps

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E2200  vs
Atom N270 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
437

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 2.5W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 0.6 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 2.19 $/year
Performance per watt 1.35 pt/W 9.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 2.03W

details

Pentium E2200  vs
Atom N270 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 47,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 12
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 0.9 - 1.16V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.09 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.83 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.09 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Pentium E2200
Report a correction
Intel Atom N270
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus