Intel Pentium E2200 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
Released October, 2007
Intel Pentium E2200
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2200
 | Much higher clock speed 2.2 GHz | | Much better performance per watt 1.35 pt/W |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.09 GHz |
VS
Released November, 2008
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C |
| | Newer Nov, 2008 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.2 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 1.35 pt/W | vs | 0.32 pt/W | Around 4.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 97.88W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.09 GHz | vs | 2.48 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 40.46 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 89.18 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 85 °C | vs | 73.3 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Newer | Nov, 2008 | vs | Oct, 2007 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2200 vs Athlon 64 X2 3250e
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2200 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| AM2 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Pentium E2200 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 85°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.09 GHz | 2.48 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.83 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.09 GHz | 2.48 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 22W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 40.46 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 89.18 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.35 pt/W | 0.32 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 97.88W | |
 Intel Pentium E2200  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $67 | $179 | |
| E2200 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| E2200 vs E6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| E2200 vs E2180 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $117 | |
| E2200 vs E4500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $125 | |
| E2200 vs E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| E2200 vs E6700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $69 | |
| E2200 vs 630 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
