Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E2180

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2180

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C vs 66.6 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2007 vs Oct, 2005 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Pentium 4 630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 630

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2 GHz 50% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz vs 3.13 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz vs 3.65 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2180 vs 4 630

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E2180  vs
4 630 
Clock speed 2 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 84W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 73.58 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 68.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Pentium E2180  vs
4 630 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 169,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 10 15
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 1.2 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 73.3°C Unknown - 66.6°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 8 8
Overclocked clock speed 3.13 GHz 3.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.65 GHz 4.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.13 GHz 3.83 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium E2180
Report a correction
Intel Pentium 4 630
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus