Intel Pentium E2180 vs AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
Released July, 2007
Intel Pentium E2180
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2180
 | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium E2180 vs Second Generation Opteron 8218
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2180 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| F | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Pentium E2180 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | 0 - 72°C | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 77.19W | |
 Intel Pentium E2180  Report a correction |  AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
