0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E2160 vs 4 620 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium E2160
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2160
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | More cores 2 |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Pentium 4 620
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 4 620
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 68.25W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 73.3 °C | vs | 67.7 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Features Key features of the Pentium E2160 vs 4 620
clock speed
Pentium E2160
1.8 GHz
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium E2160
1 MB
Pentium 4 620
2 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium E2160
3.11 GHz
Pentium 4 620
3.33 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium E2160
3.72 GHz
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
TDP
Pentium E2160
65W
Pentium 4 620
84W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2160 | vs | 4 620 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium E2160 | vs | 4 620 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 169,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 14 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 1.2 - 1.4V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 67.7°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E2160 ![]() | Intel Pentium 4 620 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 vs Pentium E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs Pentium E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $67 | |
Intel Celeron E3300 vs Pentium E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6600 vs Pentium E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $67 | |
Intel Pentium E5300 vs E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $67 | |
Intel Pentium E2140 vs E2160 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||