Intel Pentium E2160 vs Core2 Duo E8400 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium E2160
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2160
 | Higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E8400
| | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | | Much more l2 cache 6 MB |
| | Much better PassMark score 2,160 | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,251 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 73.3 °C | vs | 72.4 °C | Almost the same | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 2,160 | vs | 999 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,251 | vs | 655 | More than 90% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,826 | vs | 1,600 | More than 75% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 1.83 pt/W | vs | 1.12 pt/W | Around 65% better performance per watt | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.23 GHz | vs | 3.72 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2008 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2160 vs Core2 Duo E8400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2160 | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
details | Pentium E2160 | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 125 | |
| Overclock review score | 3 | 4.5 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | 4.23 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.12 pt/W | 1.83 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,333 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium E2160  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E8400 Report a correction |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Intel Pentium E2160, starting from $99
- 5 desktops with the Intel Core2 Duo E8400, starting from $100
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $179 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $179 | |
| Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Duo E8400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $179 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | $179 | |
| Intel Pentium E5700 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $179 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8500 vs E8400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $287 | $179 | |
| Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Duo E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
