Intel Pentium E2160 vs Core2 Duo E4300 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium E2160
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2160
 | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E4300
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E4300
| | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.21 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 73.3 °C | vs | 61.4 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.21 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2160 vs Core2 Duo E4300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2160 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
details | Pentium E2160 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 167,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 61.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 6 | |
| Overclock review score | 3 | 4 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.12 pt/W | 1.14 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium E2160  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E4300 Report a correction |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Intel Pentium E2160, starting from $99
- 1 desktop with the Intel Core2 Duo E4300, starting from $99
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $67 | $179 | |
| E2160 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| E2160 vs E6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $72 | |
| E2160 vs E5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $72 | |
| E2160 vs E5300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $69 | |
| E2160 vs 630 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $163 | |
| E2160 vs 945 | ||
 | VS | |
| $106 | ||
| E4300 vs E6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
