0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E2160 vs Core2 Duo E4300 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium E2160
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2160
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E4300
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E4300
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.21 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 73.3 °C | vs | 61.4 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.21 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2160 vs Core2 Duo E4300
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2160
1,719
Core2 Duo E4300
1,754
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2160
953
Core2 Duo E4300
960
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2160
76,700 MB/s
Core2 Duo E4300
77,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2160
1,600
Core2 Duo E4300
1,660
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2160
1,830
Core2 Duo E4300
3,008
GeekBench
Pentium E2160
3,262
Core2 Duo E4300
3,008
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E2160
999
Core2 Duo E4300
1,050
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E2160
655
Core2 Duo E4300
665
Reviews Word on the street
Pentium E2160 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 | ||
![]() | 8.0 | 8.6 |
---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2160 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
details | Pentium E2160 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 167,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 61.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 6 | |
Overclock review score | 3 | 4 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.12 pt/W | 1.14 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Pentium E2160 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E4300 ![]() |
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Intel Pentium E2160, starting from $99
- 1 desktop with the Intel Core2 Duo E4300, starting from $99
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $179 | |
E2160 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
E2160 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $72 | |
E2160 vs E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $72 | |
E2160 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $69 | |
E2160 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $163 | |
E2160 vs 945 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | ||
E4300 vs E6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||