Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E2160

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2160

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 69.88W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C vs 69.2 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.72 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 75.34 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz vs 3.33 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron D 356

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 356

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.33 GHz vs 1.8 GHz 85% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.72 GHz vs 3.11 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2160 vs Celeron D 356

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E2160  vs
Celeron D 356 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 3.33 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 86W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 20.72 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 75.34 $/year
Performance per watt 1.12 pt/W 0.53 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 69.88W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz

details

Pentium E2160  vs
Celeron D 356 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 188,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 25
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 1.25 - 1.32V
Operating temperature Unknown - 73.3°C Unknown - 69.2°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.11 GHz 4.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz 3.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.11 GHz 4.72 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium E2160
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 356
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus