0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E2160 vs Celeron D 330 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium E2160
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2160
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm |
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 | ![]() | More cores 2 |
VS
Released June, 2004
Intel Celeron D 330
- 2.66 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron D 330
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.9 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 73.3 °C | vs | 67 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 59.31W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Jul, 2006 | vs | Jun, 2004 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 63.95 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 17.59 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.53 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.72 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Pentium E2160 vs Celeron D 330
clock speed
Pentium E2160
1.8 GHz
Celeron D 330
2.66 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium E2160
1 MB
Celeron D 330
0.25 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium E2160
3.11 GHz
Celeron D 330
3.53 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium E2160
3.72 GHz
Celeron D 330
3.9 GHz
TDP
Pentium E2160
65W
Celeron D 330
73W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2160 | vs | Celeron D 330 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 73W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 17.59 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 63.95 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 59.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Pentium E2160 | vs | Celeron D 330 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.25 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 125,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 20 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 1.25 - 1.4V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 73.3°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 3.53 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.72 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 3.53 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E2160 ![]() | Intel Celeron D 330 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $67 | |
E8400 vs E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
E6300 vs E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $67 | |
E5700 vs E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $67 | |
E3300 vs E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $67 | |
E7500 vs E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | $67 | |
E4300 vs E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$163 | $67 | |
945 vs E2160 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||