CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E2160 vs 62 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium E2160

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium E2160

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E2160

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2160

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 76,700 MB/s vs 53,700 MB/s Around 45% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.11 GHz vs 2.02 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 62

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 62

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 52.81W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 73.3 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better performance per watt 2.38 pt/W vs 1.12 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer May, 2007 vs Jul, 2006 Release date 10 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2160 vs Athlon X2 62

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E2160
76,700 MB/s
Athlon X2 62
53,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E2160  vs
Athlon X2 62 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 25W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 1.12 pt/W 2.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 20.31W

details

Pentium E2160  vs
Athlon X2 62 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 73.3°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.11 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.72 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.11 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 333 MHz
Intel Pentium E2160
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 62
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus