0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E2140 vs Celeron M 450 |
Released April, 2007
Intel Pentium E2140
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2140
![]() | More cores 2 | ![]() | More threads 2 |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 61.4 °C |
VS
Released August, 2008
Intel Celeron M 450
- 2.2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron M 450
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.2 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 2,120 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 960 | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 2.63 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 61.4 °C | vs | 60.4 °C | Almost the same | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 2,120 | vs | 871 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 960 | vs | 585 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 2.63 pt/W | vs | 0.99 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Aug, 2008 | vs | Apr, 2007 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2140 vs Celeron M 450
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2140
1,521
Celeron M 450
1,078
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2140
846
Celeron M 450
1,086
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2140
68,300 MB/s
Celeron M 450
92,100 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E2140
1,447
Celeron M 450
983
GeekBench
Pentium E2140
1,771
Celeron M 450
1,734
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium E2140
871
Celeron M 450
2,120
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium E2140
585
Celeron M 450
960
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2140 | vs | Celeron M 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
478 | |||
Slot 1 | |||
M | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.99 pt/W | 2.63 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium E2140 | vs | Celeron M 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 105,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 8 | 11 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 1 - 1.34V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 61.4°C | Unknown - 60.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.06 GHz | 3.12 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium E2140 ![]() | Intel Celeron M 450 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E2140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $67 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs E2140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Pentium E2140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | $67 | |
Intel Pentium D 925 vs E2140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Pentium E2140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs Pentium E2140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E6300 vs Pentium E2140 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||