Intel Pentium E2140 vs Celeron E3400 |
Released April, 2007
Intel Pentium E2140
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E2140
 | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.06 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Celeron E3400
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron E3400
| | Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,038 |
| | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,275 | | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.06 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,038 | vs | 585 | More than 75% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,275 | vs | 1,447 | More than 55% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 1.64 pt/W | vs | 0.99 pt/W | More than 65% better performance per watt | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 61.4 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2010 | vs | Apr, 2007 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2140 vs Celeron E3400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E2140 | vs | Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.99 pt/W | 1.64 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
details | Pentium E2140 | vs | Celeron E3400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 8 | 13 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.5V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 61.4°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.06 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium E2140  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron E3400 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $42 | $179 | |
| E3400 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $125 | |
| E3400 vs E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $67 | |
| E3400 vs E5400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $42 | $72 | |
| E3400 vs E5300 | ||
 | VS | |
| $67 | $179 | |
| E2140 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| E2140 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $163 | |
| E2140 vs 945 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
