Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E2140

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2140

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium E2140 vs the Celeron E3300.

Front view of Intel Celeron E3300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E3300

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 993 vs 585 Around 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,220 vs 1,447 Around 55% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 1.58 pt/W vs 0.99 pt/W Around 60% better performance per watt
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C vs 61.4 °C More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.61 GHz vs 3.06 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2140 vs Celeron E3300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E2140
68,300 MB/s
Celeron E3300
106,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E2140  vs
Celeron E3300 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 65W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 0.99 pt/W 1.58 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Pentium E2140  vs
Celeron E3300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 8 12
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.5V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 61.4°C Unknown - 74.1°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 4 3
Overclocked clock speed 3 GHz 3.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.06 GHz 4.61 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz 3.93 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium E2140
Report a correction
Intel Celeron E3300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus