CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E2140 vs 1300 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

3.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium E2140 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium E2140  based on its performance and overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E2140

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2140

Report a correction
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.06 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz vs 2.95 GHz Almost the same
Front view of AMD Sempron 1300

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 1300

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 1.31 pt/W vs 0.99 pt/W More than 30% better performance per watt
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 75 °C vs 61.4 °C More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 52.81W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E2140 vs Sempron 1300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E2140
68,300 MB/s
Sempron 1300
61,900 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

sysmark 2007 (overall)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E2140  vs
Sempron 1300 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
462
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 45W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.99 pt/W 1.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 36.56W

details

Pentium E2140  vs
Sempron 1300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 61.4°C Unknown - 75°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3 GHz 2.95 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.06 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz 2.95 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 200 MHz
Intel Pentium E2140
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 1300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus