0 Comments
| Intel Pentium D1508 vs Atom C2758 |
Released October, 2015
Intel Pentium D1508
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D1508
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Newer Oct, 2015 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2758
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2758
![]() | More cores 8 | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
![]() | More threads 8 | ![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 16.25W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
More cores | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 20.31W | 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 6.02 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 21.9 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium D1508 vs Atom C2758
clock speed
Pentium D1508
2.2 GHz
Atom C2758
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium D1508
2.2 GHz
Atom C2758
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium D1508
2.2 GHz
Atom C2758
2.4 GHz
TDP
Pentium D1508
25W
Atom C2758
20W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D1508 | vs | Atom C2758 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 25W | 20W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 16.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Pentium D1508 | vs | Atom C2758 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 131,072 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Pentium D1508 ![]() | Intel Atom C2758 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $171 | |
C2758 vs C2750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $234 | |
C2758 vs D-1518 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $250 | |
C2758 vs E3-1230 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $82 | |
C2758 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$208 | $104 | |
C2758 vs C2558 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$129 | $234 | |
D1508 vs D-1518 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$129 | $104 | |
D1508 vs C2538 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||