0 Comments
| Intel Pentium D1508 vs Atom C2558 |
Released October, 2015
Intel Pentium D1508
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D1508
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Newer Oct, 2015 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2558
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2558
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 12.19W | ![]() | Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 20.31W | 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 6.02 $/year | 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 21.9 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Pentium D1508 vs Atom C2558
clock speed
Pentium D1508
2.2 GHz
Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium D1508
2.2 GHz
Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium D1508
2.2 GHz
Atom C2558
2.4 GHz
TDP
Pentium D1508
25W
Atom C2558
15W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D1508 | vs | Atom C2558 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 25W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Pentium D1508 | vs | Atom C2558 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 131,072 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Pentium D1508 ![]() | Intel Atom C2558 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$129 | $234 | |
D1508 vs D-1518 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$129 | $104 | |
D1508 vs C2538 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | ||
C2558 vs E3940 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $82 | |
C2558 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $208 | |
C2558 vs C2758 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $161 | |
C2558 vs N3700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $86 | |
C2558 vs C2550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||