Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium D 960

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium D 960

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 68.6 °C vs 64.4 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Celeron D 365

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 365

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 105.63W 2x lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.75 GHz vs 4.33 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 113.88 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 31.32 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Jan, 2007 vs Apr, 2006 Release date 9 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 960 vs Celeron D 365

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium D 960  vs
Celeron D 365 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 130W 65W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 0.73 pt/W 0.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 52.81W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Pentium D 960  vs
Celeron D 365 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 4 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 376,000,000 188,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 27
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.34V 1.25 - 1.32V
Operating temperature Unknown - 68.6°C Unknown - 64.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.33 GHz 4.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.33 GHz 4.75 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Pentium D 960
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 365
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus