Intel Pentium D 935 vs Core2 Duo E7500 |
Released January, 2007
Intel Pentium D 935
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 935
 | Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.27 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E7500
| | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | | Has virtualization support Yes |
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C | | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.93 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.27 GHz | vs | 3.85 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 63.4 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.06 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2009 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium D 935 vs Core2 Duo E7500
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 935 | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Pentium D 935 | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 376,000,000 | 228,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 16 | 11 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.4°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.27 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 4.06 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.27 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium D 935  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E7500 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $179 | $125 | |
| E8400 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | $125 | |
| E5700 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| Q6600 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $125 | |
| 3220 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 260 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $125 | |
| E5800 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 250 vs E7500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
