0 Comments
| | Intel Pentium D 930 vs 925 |
Released January, 2006
Intel Pentium D 930
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 930
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.8 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium D 925
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 925
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.23 GHz | | Newer Jul, 2006 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 4.4 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | vs | 3.97 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2006 | vs | Jan, 2006 | Release date 6 months later | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 930 vs 925
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 930
1,412
Pentium D 925
1,004
GeekBench
Pentium D 930
2,617
Pentium D 925
1,877
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 930 | vs | 925 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| P | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 77.19W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
details | Pentium D 930 | vs | 925 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 376,000,000 | 376,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 15 | 15 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 1.2 - 1.34V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.4°C | Unknown - 63.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.97 GHz | 4.23 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.97 GHz | 4.23 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
| Intel Pentium D 930 | Intel Pentium D 925 |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| $74 | $179 | |
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
| VS | |
| $74 | $117 | |
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E4500 | ||
| VS | |
| $74 | $64 | |
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs E5700 | ||
| VS | |
| $74 | ||
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E6300 | ||
| VS | |
| $74 | $125 | |
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E7500 | ||
| VS | |
| $74 | $67 | |
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs E2140 | ||
| VS | |
| $178 | $179 | |
| Intel Pentium D 930 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
| VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| VS | |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
| VS | |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Pyp (01:02 AM, June 29, 2014)





