Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium D 930

Front view of Intel Pentium D 930
Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Intel Celeron 560

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium D 930

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium D 930

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 560

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 77.19W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 63.4 °C Around 60% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jan, 2008 vs Jan, 2006 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 930 vs Celeron 560

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium D 930
1,412
Celeron 560
948

GeekBench

Pentium D 930
2,617
Celeron 560
1,545

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Pentium D 930  vs
Celeron 560 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption
TDP 95W 31W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 27.16 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 25.19W

details

 Pentium D 930  vs
Celeron 560 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 376,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 16
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.34V 0.95 - 1.3V
Operating temperature Unknown - 63.4°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Pentium D 930
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 560
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss