0 Comments
| | Intel Pentium D 930 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
Released January, 2006
Intel Pentium D 930
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 930
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.97 GHz |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
| | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
| | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.97 GHz | vs | 2.75 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 3.13 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 930 vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 930
1,412
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
1,629
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 930
2,617
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
2,808
GeekBench
Pentium D 930
2,617
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
2,808
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 930 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 939 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Pentium D 930 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.97 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.97 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W | |
| Intel Pentium D 930 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| E6300 vs 4400+ | ||
| VS | |
| $69 | ||
| 640 vs 4400+ | ||
| VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs 4400+ | ||
| VS | |
| $74 | ||
| 820 vs 4400+ | ||
| VS | |
| 550 vs 4400+ | ||
| VS | |
| E6600 vs 4400+ | ||
| VS | |
| $42 | ||
| G530 vs 4400+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
| VS | |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
| VS | |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||





