0 Comments
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs 4 521 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium D 925
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 925
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Released July, 2005
Intel Pentium 4 521
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 4 521
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 68.25W | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | vs | 3.72 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Newer | Jul, 2006 | vs | Jul, 2005 | Release date over a year later | |||
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 77.19W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 67.7 °C | vs | 63.4 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium D 925 vs 4 521
clock speed
Pentium D 925
3 GHz
Pentium 4 521
2.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium D 925
4 MB
Pentium 4 521
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium D 925
4.23 GHz
Pentium 4 521
3.72 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium D 925
4.4 GHz
Pentium 4 521
4.28 GHz
TDP
Pentium D 925
95W
Pentium 4 521
84W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 925 | vs | 4 521 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium D 925 | vs | 4 521 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 376,000,000 | 125,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 14 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 1.2 - 1.43V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.4°C | Unknown - 67.7°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.23 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | 4.28 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,095.6 | 713.8 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium D 925 ![]() | Intel Pentium 4 521 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | $179 | |
925 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | $117 | |
925 vs E4500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | ||
925 vs E2180 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | ||
925 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | $72 | |
925 vs E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | ||
925 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | $72 | |
925 vs E5300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||