0 Comments
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E7500 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium D 925
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 925
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.23 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.4 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E7500
![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,673 | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E7500CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | vs | 3.85 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | vs | 4.06 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,673 | vs | 1,004 | Around 2.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,204 | vs | 751 | More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better performance per dollar | 0.99 pt/$ | vs | 0.76 pt/$ | More than 30% better performance per dollar | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 63.4 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jan, 2009 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Better performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | vs | 0.59 pt/W | Around 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,877 | vs | 691 | Around 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E7500
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 925
1,004
Core2 Duo E7500
2,673
GeekBench
Pentium D 925
1,877
Core2 Duo E7500
4,879
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium D 925
691
Core2 Duo E7500
1,877
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium D 925
751
Core2 Duo E7500
1,204
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 925 | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
P | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.59 pt/W | 1.9 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Pentium D 925 | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 376,000,000 | 228,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 11 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.4°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.23 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | 4.06 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium D 925 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E7500 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $64 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Pentium E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs AMD Athlon II X2 260 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||