Intel Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E7500 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium D 925
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 925
 | Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.23 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.4 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E7500
| | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,673 | | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core2 Duo E7500CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | vs | 3.85 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | vs | 4.06 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,673 | vs | 1,004 | Around 2.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,204 | vs | 751 | More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 0.99 pt/$ | vs | 0.76 pt/$ | More than 30% better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 63.4 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2009 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| Better performance per watt | 1.9 pt/W | vs | 0.59 pt/W | Around 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,877 | vs | 691 | Around 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 925 vs Core2 Duo E7500
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 925 | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| P | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.59 pt/W | 1.9 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Pentium D 925 | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 376,000,000 | 228,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 15 | 11 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.4°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.23 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | 4.06 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium D 925  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E7500 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $179 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $64 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $125 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs AMD Athlon II X2 260 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $200 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $72 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs Pentium E5800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
