0 Comments
| Intel Pentium D 925 vs Core i3 3220 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Pentium D 925
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 925
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.23 GHz | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.4 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3220
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Core i3 3220CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | vs | 3.43 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | vs | 3.46 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 5,351 | vs | 1,004 | More than 5.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 77.19W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 751 | More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better performance per dollar | 1.18 pt/$ | vs | 0.76 pt/$ | More than 55% better performance per dollar | |||
Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
Better PassMark score | 4,229 | vs | 691 | More than 6x better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | vs | 0.59 pt/W | More than 4.5x better performance per watt | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 925 vs Core i3 3220
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 925
1,004
Core i3 3220
5,351
GeekBench
Pentium D 925
1,877
Core i3 3220
8,919
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium D 925
691
Core i3 3220
4,229
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium D 925
751
Core i3 3220
1,764
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 925 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
P | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.59 pt/W | 2.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 44.69W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Pentium D 925 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 33 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63.4°C | Unknown - 65.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.23 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.4 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,095.6 | 3,775.1 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.23 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
Intel Pentium D 925 ![]() | Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $75 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $94 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD E1 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||