0 Comments
| Intel Pentium D 830 vs Core2 Duo E8400 |
Released April, 2005
Intel Pentium D 830
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 830
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.5 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E8400
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 2,160 |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,251 | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 1.83 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz | vs | 4.23 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better PassMark score | 2,160 | vs | 645 | More than 3.2x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,251 | vs | 698 | Around 80% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.83 pt/W | vs | 0.6 pt/W | More than 3x better performance per watt | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 105.63W | 2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 3.55 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.4 °C | vs | 69.8 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | 2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Jan, 2008 | vs | Apr, 2005 | Release date over 2 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 830 vs Core2 Duo E8400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 830
1,493
Core2 Duo E8400
2,982
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 830
841
Core2 Duo E8400
1,625
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium D 830
108,300 MB/s
Core2 Duo E8400
128,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium D 830
645
Core2 Duo E8400
2,160
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium D 830
698
Core2 Duo E8400
1,251
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 830 | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.6 pt/W | 1.83 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Pentium D 830 | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 230,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.4V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.8°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.55 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz | 4.23 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.55 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium D 830 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E8400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
3220 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
E7500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $179 | |
Q8400 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $179 | |
E5700 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $179 | |
Q9550 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
250 vs E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||