Winner
Intel Celeron N3050
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3050 based on its performance, power consumption and value.
See full details Intel Pentium D 830 vs Celeron N3050 |
Released April, 2005
Intel Pentium D 830
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 830
 | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 108,300 MB/s | | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.55 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.5 GHz |
VS
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3050
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
8.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Celeron N3050
| | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 4.88W |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 830 vs N3050 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Celeron N3050CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 108,300 MB/s | vs | 350.4 MB/s | More than 309x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 85% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.55 GHz | vs | 2.14 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 4.88W | vs | 105.63W | 21.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 8.65 pt/W | vs | 0.6 pt/W | More than 14.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2005 | Release date over 9 years later | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | 21.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 21.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 0.48 pt/$ | vs | 0.25 pt/$ | More than 95% better performance per dollar | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium D 830 vs Celeron N3050
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 830 | vs | Celeron N3050 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 130W | 6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.6 pt/W | 8.65 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Pentium D 830 | vs | Celeron N3050 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.55 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.55 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 320 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
 Intel Pentium D 830  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron N3050 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs N2840 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $161 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Pentium N3700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $275 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $17 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $21 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs N3060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | $161 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Pentium N3540 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
| | VS | |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
