0 Comments
| Intel Pentium D 805 vs Itanium 9350 |
Released January, 2005
Intel Pentium D 805
- 2.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium D 805
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year |
VS
Released February, 2010
Intel Itanium 9350
- 1.73 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Itanium 9350
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.73 GHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 150.31W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 44.57 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 162.06 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more threads | |||
Newer | Feb, 2010 | vs | Jan, 2005 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once |
Features Key features of the Pentium D 805 vs Itanium 9350
clock speed
Pentium D 805
2.66 GHz
Itanium 9350
1.73 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium D 805
2 MB
Itanium 9350
2 MB
TDP
Pentium D 805
95W
Itanium 9350
185W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium D 805 | vs | Itanium 9350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 1.73 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
LGA 1248 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 185W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 44.57 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 162.06 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 150.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | QPI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 2,400 MHz |
details | Pentium D 805 | vs | Itanium 9350 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium D 805 ![]() | Intel Itanium 9350 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$93 | $67 | |
805 vs E5400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$93 | $179 | |
805 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$93 | ||
805 vs E2180 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$93 | $69 | |
805 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$93 | $72 | |
805 vs E5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$93 | ||
805 vs 631 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,838 | $1,443 | |
9350 vs X5570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||