CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of B980 vs SU2300

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Pentium B980 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium B980  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium B980

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium B980

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium B980

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium B980

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz 2x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 8.24 pt/$ vs 0.99 pt/$ More than 8.2x better performance per dollar
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,116 vs 495 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,462.5 vs 1,000 Around 2.5x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.44 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark score 2,069 vs 814 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 2,741 vs 1,168 More than 2.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium B980 vs Celeron SU2300

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Passmark

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium B980  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
BGA 956

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 10W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.41 $/year
Performance per watt 9.4 pt/W 13.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 8.13W

details

Pentium B980  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1.44 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium B980
Report a correction
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus