0 Comments
| Intel Pentium B960 vs Celeron B815 |
VS
Released January, 2012
Intel Celeron B815
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron B815
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium B960 vs the Celeron B815. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium B960 vs Celeron B815
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium B960
2,755
Celeron B815
2,090
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium B960
1,575
Celeron B815
1,202
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium B960
108,800 MB/s
Celeron B815
78,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium B960
2,637
Celeron B815
2,017
GeekBench
Pentium B960
4,781
Celeron B815
2,635
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium B960
1,859
Celeron B815
1,368
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium B960
1,054
Celeron B815
792
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium B960 | vs | Celeron B815 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.98 pt/W | 2.44 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Pentium B960 | vs | Celeron B815 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 22 | 16 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 85°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Pentium B960 ![]() | Intel Celeron B815 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $246 | |
2328M vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $246 | |
2020M vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $246 | |
3220 vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | $246 | |
3210M vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $246 | |
1000M vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $246 | |
3110M vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | $86 | |
2350M vs B815 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||