Intel Pentium B960 vs Celeron B815 |
VS
Released January, 2012
Intel Celeron B815
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron B815
 | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium B960 vs the Celeron B815. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium B960 vs Celeron B815
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium B960 | vs | Celeron B815 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.98 pt/W | 2.44 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium B960 | vs | Celeron B815 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 22 | 16 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 85°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 16,384 MB | |
 Intel Pentium B960  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron B815 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $246 | |
| 2328M vs B960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $246 | |
| 2020M vs B960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $246 | |
| 3220 vs B960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $130 | $246 | |
| 3210M vs B960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $246 | |
| 1000M vs B960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $80 | $246 | |
| 3110M vs B960 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $65 | $86 | |
| 2350M vs B815 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
